Using a Valuation for a Shareholder Buyout

Shareholder buyouts occur frequently in closely held businesses and often are costly for parties that feel that the payout is unfair – whether too high or too low.

Triggering events for buyouts happen all the time, yet as a business owner they are often not events you spend time thinking about every day. They include:

  • Retirement of a shareholder
  • Shareholder seeking to exit partnership
  • Death of a shareholder
  • Inability to continue working together
  • Shareholder involved in a divorce

They can also be costly if the ownership interests transferred are not valued properly, primarily due to the time and expense associated with litigating shareholder disputes or resolving transactions with the Internal Revenue Service. Even when a buy-sell agreement exists, it may be prudent for the shareholders to engage the services of a trained and accredited valuation professional.

Valuation professionals help mitigate the risks associated with a shareholder buyout by preparing a supportable, well documented valuation report that is based on a well-defined assignment, comprehensive data gathering, and a thorough analysis of the factors affecting the value of the business. The failure to engage a professional to work through valuation leaves the parties involved open to acrimony, drawn out negotiations, and the potential for costly litigation.

Defining the assignment

Confusion and misunderstandings arise in shareholder buyouts when the valuation assignment is not carefully defined between the appraiser and the shareholders for whom the valuation is being prepared.

The most critical aspects of defining the assignment are choosing the appropriate standard of value and properly addressing the impact to value of control and minority interests.

A common standard of value is fair market value, under which a minority interest is valued with the appropriate lack of control and lack of marketability discounts. However, shareholders in a buyout situation may prefer that 100 percent of a company be valued regardless of the ownership interest that will be transferred, since they may be negotiating based on the pro rata value of the entire corporation.

Another standard of value used in shareholder buyouts is fair value, which is commonly used in dissenting shareholder valuations and minority oppression cases. Because fair value is a statutory standard defined by state case law, the business appraiser should further clarify in the engagement letter what discounts will or will not be considered in a valuation under the fair value standard.

Tip: Understanding standards of value is critical, as various discounts for control and marketability can have an enormous impact on the value of the interest appraised.

Gathering the data

Once we have defined the parameters of the assignment the appraiser must gather data, to include both company specific information and industry information. Part of this process normally includes a management interview to both gather data and clarify any of the information provided.

Of concern is access to reliable company data. Depending on the context that the valuation is being performed under, management may have a vested interest in the outcome of the valuation and their answers may be skewed.

A skilled appraiser will determine whether management’s statements makes sense based in context of the company’s within its industry and the market factors that drive the industry.

Analyzing the data

The next step in the appraisal process is for the appraiser to analyze the data gathered and to develop valuation models. An appraiser must ordinarily consider each valuation model or method that is likely to be applicable to the subject company.

Approaches will often include the asset approach involves determining a value indication using the value of the assets of the business less the liabilities. Since the net asset value does not include the intangible value of the company, the asset value will often “set the floor” for any valuation.

The income approach involves ascertaining the value of the future economic benefit stream of the company in today’s dollars. The anticipated benefits are usually based either on historical income statements, adjusted to reflect the ongoing earnings of the business, or forecasted income statements.

Of critical importance is making normalizing adjustments. As small business’ financial statements are often managed to a tax purpose normalizing adjustments are often required to indicate the true economic benefit of ownership. (That being said, minority owners may not always be entitled to such adjustments based on their lack of control. This is a critical point to understand when Defining the Engagement.)

Tip: Normalizing adjustments can have a very large impact on value. Discuss with your valuator if they are appropriate for your situation.

Using the Market Approach, the appraiser will use actual market transactions involving either sales of entire businesses or minority interests. This can provide objective, empirical data for developing value measures that apply to the valuation. This empirical data is critical in valuations for the purpose of shareholder buyouts, because it provides support for values derived under the income approach.

Conclusion

Even if a shareholder does not agree with the opinion of value, the shareholder is less likely to challenge a comprehensive, well documented valuation report by an accredited professional.

When the shareholders involved in a transaction understand and agree with the valuation process, they are more likely to negotiate successful transactions and avoid potentially costly and lengthy litigation.

 


Takeaways:

  • What is the standard of value?
  • Fair Market Value, Fair Value, or something else?
  • What Discounts will be taken? What portion of the business will be valued?
  • Involve your analyst early
  • Insure data discovery is robust

 


.

.

X